HOME RESIDENTS BUSINESS VISITORS SENIORS
Site Map
KIDS
Site Tips
MEDIA
Contact Us
 

Wiregrass Home and Garden Show - Dothan Civic Center - September 18-21

   Planning Home
   Land Development
   Permits & Inspections
   Transportation
   Planning
   Community
   Development
   Long Range Planning

 

 

 

 

Long Range Planning

 
 

Steven Spry
Long Range Planner

 

Long Range Planning directly involves the community in identifying goals with regard to quality of life for the foreseeable future, typically twenty years. It examines existing quantitative and qualitative aspects of the community such as housing, demographics, education, transportation infrastructure, public utility infrastructure, land use patterns, regulations governing land development, parks and open spaces, sense of community, and sense of place.  The long range plan, sometimes referred as a comprehensive plan because of the broad scope it encompasses, is guided by citizen input and projects the needs examined above into a coherent development strategy that is implemented through the policies, programs, regulations, or ordinances of the city.

 

City of Dothan

2008 Long Range Development Plan Public Forums

 

On April 10, May 13, May 27, June 10 and June 24, 2008, staff of the City of Dothan Planning Department staff conducted forums as part of the public-involvement process aimed at generating input on issues relative to the physical development of our community.  This input, gathered from all over the city, will be used by staff to generate plan goals, over the next 20 years. 

 

The City of Dothan believes that citizen involvement in the planning process is important because it:

 

n        Informs the community about the planning process.

n        Encourages expression of views on issues in the community.

n        Facilitates involvement in the development of the plan.

n        Gains support for the plan and its implementation.

 

The agenda for these meetings was simple, educate to audience, measure their preferences for a variety of development characteristics and collect their thoughts directly on their perceptions of what is a strength, weakness, opportunity or threat to Dothan.

 

As an educational tool, the video, a “Community of Choices”, was shown to illustrate how development impacts our community and how we, as a community, can influence development through planning if we better understand the connections between community appearance, design and economic development.

 

Following the video, staff presented a visual preference survey (VPS) which is a widely used method of assessing community preferences regarding the form and appearance of buildings, landscape, and streetscape elements. The audience was asked to indicate on a score card which of two images they preferred.  If they preferred neither, they were asked make no entry. This report presents the results of the VPS and outlines the characteristics or elements that separated one image from the other.  A few preliminary conclusions are offered for consideration.

 


Finally, staff gave the participants four colored note cards and asked them to list as many strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats they could think of on a different card when prompted by staff.  Participants were instructed to think of strengths and weaknesses in terms of current issues and opportunities and threats are future issues.  Together, staff is hopeful that the two “visioning” exercises will point to obvious community-wide concerns that will become the basis for plan goals and the policies and objectives that can be used to implement them.

 


Results of the Visual Preference Survey for Dothan

 

The following discussion details the results of the VPS for each category.  The presentation slides are available by clicking here.

 

Category:  Signs

1          81% (95) of people who participated chose a commercial monument sign over the conventional commercial street signage found along our roads, while 9% (11) selected the conventional signage and 9% (11) indicated they had no preference.

2          58% (68) of people who participated chose a commercial marquee-type sign over the conventional individual, commercial street signage found along our roads, while 26% (30) selected the conventional signage and 17% (19) indicated they had no preference.

3          65% (76) of people who participated chose a individual uncluttered conventional commercial signs over another example of commercial marquee-type signage found along our roads, while  21% (25) selected the commercial marquee-type signage and 14% (16) indicated they had no preference. This contradicts the previous slide results.

 

Category:  Downtown

4          85% (99) of people who participated chose a downtown commercial streetscape with benches, trees, and wide sidewalks over a typical streetscape found along our roads downtown, while 11% (13) selected our typical downtown streetscape and only 4% (5) indicated they had no preference. This may indicate a favorable atmosphere for downtown improvements.

5          83% (97) of people who participated chose a downtown streetscape peopled with diners and outside patio dining while 11% (13) selected a picture of South Foster Street with narrow sidewalks and parallel street parking and 6% (7) indicated they had no preference.

6          90% (105) of people who participated chose a downtown focal point such as the square in Andalusia, AL, while 4% (5) selected our typical downtown as seen from south Oates bridge looking north toward Main Street and 6% (7) indicated they had no preference. This may indicate a favorable atmosphere for downtown improvements.


Category:  Neighborhoods

7          85% (99) of people who participated chose a residential neighborhood streetscape with sidewalks, street trees, and hedge-lined front yards. 7% (8) selected a street void of trees, no sidewalks and wide paving. 9% (10) indicated they had no preference. This may indicate a favorable atmosphere for a stronger landscape ordinance or the development of design guidelines for new residential development in and around Dothan.

8          84% (98) of people who participated chose a residential neighborhood streetscape with sidewalks, street trees, and hedge-lined front yards. 9% (11) selected a shot of one of Dothan’s neighborhoods that is street void of trees, no sidewalks and wide paving. 7% (8) indicated they had no preference. This may indicate a favorable atmosphere for a stronger landscape ordinance or passage in the subdivision regulations or the development of design guidelines for new residential development in and around Dothan.

 

Category:  Street Lighting

9          87% (102) of people who participated chose an ornamental look to street lights. 7% (8) selected a standard street light on a pole which is commonplace in Dothan. 6% (7) indicated they had no preference. This may indicate a favorable atmosphere for the development of design guidelines for new residential development in and around Dothan.

10        74% (86) of people who participated chose an ornamental look to street lights. 15% (18) selected a standard street light on a pole which is commonplace in Dothan. 11% (13) indicated they had no preference. This may indicate a favorable atmosphere for the development of design guidelines for new residential development in and around Dothan.

 

Category:  Street Art

11        44% (51) of people who participated chose our current mural art. 29% (34) selected a form of temporary chalk sidewalk art. 27% (32) indicated they had no preference.

12        40% (47) of people who participated chose an example of a metal sculpture as a preferred form of street art. 32% (38) selected a piece of stone abstract art as a good form of street art. 27% (32) indicated they had no preference. This was nearly split evenly, although 72% of those who participated chose some form of art over those that had no opinion or preference.

13        62% (73) of people who participated chose an example of metal still life as street art they’d like to see. 23% (27) selected the traditional “peanut” man prevalent around the city as a preferred form of street art. 15% (17) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Alleys

14        85% (100) of people who participated chose a functional paved alley with rear-loading garages. Only 8% (10) selected the style of alley found in our downtown. 5% (6) indicated they had no preference. Another indication of the public readiness for some form of design guidelines.

15        50% (59) of people who participated preferred the example of a new subdivision with a functional alley and rear-loading garages. 34% (40) were content with the type alleys found in the neighborhoods west of downtown. 15% (18) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Sidewalks

16        78% (91) of people who participated chose sidewalks that were separated from roadways. 15% (18) selected sidewalks separated by only a narrow strip of grass and hedge material. 7% (8) indicated they had no preference.

17        60% (70) of people who participated chose sidewalks that were paved with brick pavers and separated from roadways by a landscaped buffer. 27% (32) selected sidewalks with no separation from the curb and street. 12% (14) indicated they had no preference.

18        72% (84) of people who participated chose downtown sidewalks that were inviting and had benches, bus stops, and ornate street lighting. 20% (23) selected downtown sidewalks that were functional but with no benches or other “softer” places. 8% (10) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Subdivision Design

19        55% (64) of people who participated chose a subdivision design with curvilinear roads, interior trails, water-filled detention/amenity ponds, and short cul-de-sacs. 22% (26) selected a subdivision design of a single, straight and long cul-de-sac with front sidewalks. 23% (27) indicated they had no preference.

20        61% (71) of people who participated chose a subdivision design with curvilinear roads, sidewalks and trails, water-filled detention/amenity ponds, and short cul-de-sacs. 18% (21) selected a subdivision design of straight and long cul-de-sacs with no sidewalks. 21% (25) indicated they had no preference.

21        79% (93) of people who participated chose a neo-traditional subdivision design with curvilinear roads, neighborhood park focal points, interior trails, water-filled detention/amenity ponds, and short cul-de-sacs. 14% (16) selected a subdivision with a grid design. 7% (8) indicated they had no preference.

22        66% (60) of people who participated chose a subdivision design with curvilinear roads, interior trails, water-filled detention/amenity ponds, and short cul-de-sacs. 16% (15) selected a subdivision design of straight and long cul-de-sacs with no sidewalks. 18% (16) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Commercial Design

23        63% (74) of people who participated chose a commercial development design with an internal street system, smaller in size, and with some indication of landscaping and abutting a residential neighborhood. 12% (14) selected one that was spread out and heavily paved.  25% (29) indicated they had no preference.

24        35% (41) of people who participated chose a commercial development design with a central core of retail buildings and perimeter parking as well as landscaping. 32% (37) selected one that was spread out and heavily paved.  33% (39) indicated they had no preference.

25        82% (96) of people who participated chose a commercial development design with landscaping. 14% (16) selected one that was not landscaped.  4% (5) indicated they had no preference.

26        89% (104) of people who participated chose a commercial development design with landscaping. Only 7% (8) selected one that was spread out and heavily paved.  4% (5) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Detention Pond

27        84% (98) of people who participated chose a “wet” detention pond with some indication of landscaping. 6% (7) selected one that was “dry”.  10% (12) indicated they had no preference.

28        67% (78) of people who participated chose a “wet” detention pond with some indication of landscaping. 10% (12) selected one that was “dry”.  23% (27) indicated they had no preference.

29        82% (96) of people who participated chose a “wet” detention pond with some indication of landscaping. 6% (7) selected one that was “dry”.  12% (14) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Parking Lots

30        82% (96) of people who participated chose a landscaped parking lot. 10% (12) selected one that was not landscaped.  8% (9) indicated they had no preference.

31        88% (103) of people who participated chose a landscaped parking lot. 6% (7) selected one that was not landscaped.  6% (7) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Buildings

32        78% (91) of people who participated chose a brick building. 8% (9) selected one that was metal and brick.  14% (16) indicated they had no preference.

33        88% (104) of people who participated chose a quarried stone building. 6% (7) selected one that was metal and brick.  6% (7) indicated they had no preference.

34        85% (100) of people who participated chose an older historic building. 8% (9) selected one that was new.  7% (8) indicated they had no preference.

35        75% (88) of people who participated chose an older historic building. 17% (20) selected one that was new.  8% (9) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Highways

36        81% (95) of people who participated chose a highway with treed buffering along the shoulders. 10% (12) selected one that was more compact, no buffering and with a fly-over set of lanes.  9% (10) indicated they had no preference.

37        55% (64) of people who participated chose an open highway. 32% (38) selected one with a “spaghetti bowl” intersection design typically found in highly-urbanized, metropolitan areas. 13% (15) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Traffic

38        86% (82) of people who participated chose free-flowing traffic. 8% (8) selected congested traffic.  6% (6) indicated they had no preference.

39        78% (74) of people who participated chose free-flowing traffic. 9% (9) selected congested traffic.  13% (13) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Gateways

40        79% (92) of people who participated chose a masonry gateway announcing arrival to the city. 13% (15) selected a simple road-side sign.  8% (10) indicated they had no preference.

41        92% (107) of people who participated chose a masonry gateway announcing arrival to the city. 5% (6) selected a simple road-side sign.  3% (4) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Subdivision Entry

42        54% (58) of people who participated chose a gated entryway flanked by a masonry wall announcing arrival to the subdivision. 28% (30) selected a simple monument in the middle of the entry street.  18% (19) indicated they had no preference.

43        78% (91) of people who participated chose a gated entryway with a reflecting pond and masonry wall announcing arrival to the subdivision. 9% (11) selected a simple monument in the middle off to the side of the entry street.  13% (15) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Streetscapes

44        92% (107) of people who participated chose a narrower street with mature trees and landscaped front yards. 4% (5) selected a wider street with little to no front yard landscaping.  4% (5) indicated they had no preference.

45        83% (97) of people who participated chose a narrower street with mature trees and landscaped front yards with a sidewalk. 12% (14) selected a wider street with little to no front yard landscaping.  5% (7) indicated they had no preference.

46        88% (103) of people who participated chose a narrower, curving street with mature trees and landscaped front yards with a sidewalk. 8% (9) selected a wider street with little to no front yard landscaping.  4% (5) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Single Family

47        53% (62) of people who participated felt the need in Dothan for a large two-storied type housing over a sprawling estate-type home. 26% (30) selected an estate-type home as one of which Dothan needs more.  21% (25) indicated they had no preference.

48        51% (59) of people who participated felt the need in Dothan for a standard single-storied ranch type housing over a patio or garden home. 34% (40) selected an patio or garden-type home as one of which Dothan needs more.  15% (17) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Cluster Homes

49        42% (49) of people who participated felt the need for a clustered garden-type housing with no front driveways over a clustered townhouse-type home with front driveways. 34% (40) selected the townhouse-type home as one of which Dothan needs more.  24% (29) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Multi-Family

50        74% (86) of people who participated felt the need for a large two-storied type apartment housing in a campus styled layout. 11% (13) selected a two-storied apartment layout where each unit faces a road and has a garage as one of which Dothan needs more.  15% (18) indicated they had no preference.

 

Category:  Sprawl

51        45% (52) of people who participated felt that housing should be clustered on smaller lots with more open space in the development as common area over a sprawling estate-type home development with large, individual lots. 38% (45) selected an estate-type home development on large lots as one of which Dothan needs more.  17% (20) indicated they had no preference.

52        52% (47) of people who participated felt that housing should be clustered on smaller lots with more open space in the development as common area over a standard single family-type home development with larger, individual lots. 22% (20) selected a standard single family-type home development on larger lots as one of which Dothan needs more.  26% (23) indicated they had no preference.

 

GENERAL COMMENTS

1 Keep the same laws                                                                                                       

2 Insulting and waste of time                                                                                           

3 Should not show film before choosing                                                                       

4 Beautiful stone signs coming into Dothan stating “Welcome to Dothan – Peanut Capital of the World”

5 Long term planning to restore historic Dothan by taking away the signage like the video suggest. Continue push to rebuild downtown by offering incentives to business people to restore buildings, plant trees and flowers to restore natural beauty, and create a reason for locals as well as visitors to want to come to downtown Dothan.

6 Thanks very much for your presentation                                                                    

7 I feel that Dothan does have a lot of growth potential with the right planning and development.

8 You should take this film to every church and civic club to promote downtown.

9 Great presentation. Too much like a class.

10 Great Presentation


 

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT MISSION STATEMENT:

It is the mission of the Department of Planning and Development to protect and encourage the vitality and livability of the city's existing residential neighborhoods; encourage the development of new sustainable neighborhoods through effective and creative design techniques; promote the sustainability of the city’s commercial and industrial economic base; improve regional mobility through multi-modal transportation planning and initiatives and enhance the safety, health and the quality of life of the residents of the City of Dothan.

 


Todd L. McDonald, AICP
Planning & Development Director
Planning & Development Contacts

Lee Ann Irwin
Administrative Assistant

More...

 
Downtown Dothan
Master Plan
 

Survey Cover
Citizen Survey
Report

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The City of Dothan, P O Box 2128, Dothan, Alabama 36302
Copyright © 2007 All Rights Reserved 
Disclaimer
Page Updated Wednesday, July 09, 2008 07:43:10 AM

   
   

Site Best Viewed at 1024x768